Bittins v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co.

186 Ill. App. 138
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 4, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,353·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Carriers, § 476*—when recovery for injuries sustained while aP tempting to hoard a street car not sustained hy the evidence. In an action against a street railway company for injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant in starting a car when plaintiff attempted to hoard it, a judgment for plaintiff held not sustained hy the evidence, it appearing that the plaintiff’s evidence was conflicting and unsatisfactory and a number of witnesses for the defendant testified that the car was in motion when plaintiff attempted to board the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bittins v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co., 186 Ill. App. 138 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

186 Ill. App. 138 (Bittins v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.