Biter v. South Carolina Employment Security Commission
This text of 280 S.E.2d 60 (Biter v. South Carolina Employment Security Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant South Carolina Employment Security Commission determined that the respondent had been discharged for misconduct within the sense of Section 41-35-120(2), Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. The respondent was therefore held disqualified to receive benefits for a period of five weeks. At the end of this period she commenced receiving benefits and continued to do so until they were exhausted. On appeal to the circuit court, respondent obtained a ruling that the Commission erred in its decision that she had been [494]*494discharged for misconduct. From this holding the Commission now appeals.
Upon review of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, we find no justiciable issue between these parties. Counsel concedes in effect that the appeal seeks an advisory opinion only. This Court has consistently refrained from rendering such opinions, and accordingly this appeal is dismissed in light of our previous holdings. Booth v. Grissom, 265 S. C. 190, 192, 217 S. E. (2d) 223; O’Shields v. McLeod, 257 S. C. 477, 482, 186 S. E. (2d) 408.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 S.E.2d 60, 276 S.C. 493, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biter-v-south-carolina-employment-security-commission-sc-1981.