Biswas v. Division of Employment Security

534 S.W.3d 306
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 12, 2017
DocketNo. ED 105037
StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 306 (Biswas v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biswas v. Division of Employment Security, 534 S.W.3d 306 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mita Biswas (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor.and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding her “second quarter 2014 wages are not properly includible in her base period” because the law excludes the most recent completed calendar quarter wages from the benefit calculation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission properly excluded Claimant’s second quarter 2014 wages in her base period wages in determining her benefits award and the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Welsh v. Mentor Management, Inc., 357 S.W.3d 277, 280 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welsh v. Mentor Management, Inc.
357 S.W.3d 277 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 S.W.3d 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biswas-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2017.