Bissett v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Bissett v. Department of Highways

16 Ct. Cl. 120

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 12, 1986

DocketCC-86-154

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Ct. Cl. 120 (Bissett v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bissett v. Department of Highways, 16 Ct. Cl. 120 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On April 9, 1986, at about 10:00 a.m., the claimant was operating her 1979 AMC Spirit on the one-lane Everson Bridge, near Route 19, Marion County. Claimant had passed over the pothole, the existence of which was known to her. Upon seeing an oncoming vehicle on the one-lane bridge, she stopped and backed up and backed into the pothole, thus damaging her automobile. Damage to the vehicle amounted to $192.57. The claimant testified that she had travelled this bridge several times before the incident and was aware of the existence of the pothole. She was not able to state definitely that the hole had been present for the winter, but she could state that it had been in existence in March, the month before this incident.

[121]*121The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947) . In order for the respondent to be found liable for damages caused by the pothole, proof of actual or constructive notice must be shown. Davis Auto Parts v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 31 (1977). Constructive notice of the pothole was present in this case, but claimant's prior knowledge of the bridge makes her likewise negligent. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, the Court is of the opinion that the claimant's negligence was equal to the respondent's and disallows the claim. Merrill v. Dept. of Highways, 15 Ct. Cl. 196 (1984).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On April 9, 1986, at about 10:00 a.m., the claimant was operating her 1979 AMC Spirit on the one-lane Everson Bridge, near Route 19, Marion County. Claimant had passed over the pothole, the existence of which was known to her. Upon seeing an oncoming vehicle on the one-lane bridge, she stopped and backed up and backed into the pothole, thus damaging her automobile. Damage to the vehicle amounted to $192.57. The claimant testified that she had travelled this bridge several times before the incident and was aware of the existence of the pothole. She was not able to state definitely that the hole had been present for the winter, but she could state that it had been in existence in March, the month before this incident.

[121]*121The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947) . In order for the respondent to be found liable for damages caused by the pothole, proof of actual or constructive notice must be shown. Davis Auto Parts v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 31 (1977). Constructive notice of the pothole was present in this case, but claimant's prior knowledge of the bridge makes her likewise negligent. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, the Court is of the opinion that the claimant's negligence was equal to the respondent's and disallows the claim. Merrill v. Dept. of Highways, 15 Ct. Cl. 196 (1984).

Claim disallowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ct. Cl. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bissett-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack