Bissell v. Town of Amherst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bissell v. Town of Amherst

6 A.D.3d 1230, 775 N.Y.S.2d 731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2004

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 1230 (Bissell v. Town of Amherst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bissell v. Town of Amherst, 6 A.D.3d 1230, 775 N.Y.S.2d 731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (David J. Mahoney, J.), entered June 20, 2003. The order granted the motion of plaintiffs for leave to reargue and renew and, upon reargument and renewal, granted their motion for partial summary judgment in part and denied defendant’s cross motion for leave to reargue and renew.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Bissell v Town of Amherst (6 AD3d [1231]*1231— [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (David J. Mahoney, J.), entered June 20, 2003. The order granted the motion of plaintiffs for leave to reargue and renew and, upon reargument and renewal, granted their motion for partial summary judgment in part and denied defendant’s cross motion for leave to reargue and renew.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Bissell v Town of Amherst (6 AD3d [1231]*1231— [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 1230, 775 N.Y.S.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bissell-v-town-of-amherst-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack