Bissell v. Post

4 Day 79
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The judgment of the superior court Is affirmed, because it appears by the record, that the [84] plaintiffs were creditors of Wass, the bankrupt, at the £™e 'of issuing the commission against him; and, as such, [85] might have opposed the proceedings in their commencement, or in any subsequent stage. If dissatisfied, their [86] only mode of relief is given in the 52d section of the u Act to establish a uniform system of bankruptcy," [87] See thé case of Barstow v. Adams, and the reasons thefe assigned on this poiut.(a)

Judgment affirmed.

Üpon the whole, if the jury are of opinion, upon the points submitted to thena, thatan act of bankruptcy was committed on the 13th or 14th of January, or on the 1st of June, they must find a verdict for the plaintiffs, notwithstanding Billington and Ccrless’s execution. If otherwise, they must find tor the defendants.

The jury found for the plaintiffs.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bissell v. Post, 4 Day 79 (Colo. 1809).

4 Day 79 (Bissell v. Post) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Church v. Knox
2 Conn. 514 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1818)