Bissell v. Hall
11 Johns. 168
This text of 11 Johns. 168 (Bissell v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bissell v. Hall, 11 Johns. 168 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).
Opinion
The plea of the statute of limitations was improperly overruled by the justice. Judgments of the courts of other states are considered in this state as simple contracts only, to which the statute of limitations may be pleaded. It was so decided by this court in the case of Hubbell v. Cowdrey. (5 Johns. Rep. 131.) The judgment below must, therefore, be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Johns. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bissell-v-hall-nysupct-1814.