Bissell v. Dennison

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Bissell v. Dennison

14 Johns. 483

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedMarch 15, 1817

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Johns. 483 (Bissell v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bissell v. Dennison, 14 Johns. 483 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Thompson, Ch. J.

As the appellant is not ready to proceed, and no person appears to oppose the decree of the court below, I think the court ought to dismiss the appeal. The respondent is entitled to bring on the hearing ex parte; but as the court never hear an argument ex parte, the respondent must be entitled to his decree in the court below.

After some discussion, as to the regularity of this proceeding/Üie court were of opinion that it was, correct.

Per Curiam. Ordered, that the appeal be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson, Ch. J.

As the appellant is not ready to proceed, and no person appears to oppose the decree of the court below, I think the court ought to dismiss the appeal. The respondent is entitled to bring on the hearing ex parte; but as the court never hear an argument ex parte, the respondent must be entitled to his decree in the court below.

After some discussion, as to the regularity of this proceeding/Üie court were of opinion that it was, correct.

Per Curiam. Ordered, that the appeal be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Johns. 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bissell-v-dennison-nycterr-1817.