Bissel v. Southworth

1 Root 269
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 15, 1791
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 269 (Bissel v. Southworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bissel v. Southworth, 1 Root 269 (Colo. 1791).

Opinion

The court in giving tbeir reasons to tbe jury, agreed, that where a river, which is not navigable^ divides between two adjoining proprietors, tbeir lands meet in tbe middle of the river; and where lands are so situated that a division fence cannot be maintained in the dividing line, it is a case not provided for in tbe statute, and must be governed by tbe principles of reason and justice; and be that keeps cattle, must so keep them, as to prevent tbeir injuring tbe property of others. Tbe improvement of lands by ploughing and mowing, is of great public utility, it is therefore to be encouraged and protected; and tbe defendant’s turning his cattle upon bis own land knowing of tbe situation, was a trespass upon tbe plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Studwell v. Ritch
14 Conn. 292 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1841)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bissel-v-southworth-conn-1791.