Bissat v. City of Visalia
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 RASHID BISSAT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01649-JLT-SKO
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 80)
14 CITY OF VISALIA, A CALIFORNIA 15 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND
17 Defendant.
18 19 On June 11, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 20 (Doc. 80). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 22 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: June 11, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bissat v. City of Visalia (Bissat v. City of Visalia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.