Bissat v. City of Visalia

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 11, 2024·No. 1:21-cv-01649·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 RASHID BISSAT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01649-JLT-SKO

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 80)

14 CITY OF VISALIA, A CALIFORNIA 15 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND

17 Defendant.

18 19 On June 11, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 20 (Doc. 80). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 22 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: June 11, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bissat v. City of Visalia, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Bissat v. City of Visalia (Bissat v. City of Visalia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)