Home/Supreme Court/Bisno v. Martin

Bisno v. Martin

409 U.S. 990, 93 S. Ct. 333, 34 L. Ed. 2d 257, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 886
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 6, 1972
DocketNo. 72-5039
StatusPublished
Cited by39 cases

This text of 409 U.S. 990 (Bisno v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bisno v. Martin, 409 U.S. 990, 93 S. Ct. 333, 34 L. Ed. 2d 257, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 886 (1972).

Opinion

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albright v. City of New Orleans
208 F. Supp. 2d 634 (E.D. Louisiana, 2002)
Thompson v. Johnson
7 F. Supp. 2d 848 (S.D. Texas, 1998)
Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United States
37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,178 (Court of Claims, 1991)
Colpitt v. Cunningham
638 F. Supp. 1277 (D. New Hampshire, 1986)
Estate of Rockefeller v. Commissioner
762 F.2d 264 (Second Circuit, 1985)
ESTATE OF
762 F.2d 264 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Collins v. Foster
487 A.2d 1189 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1985)
Grann v. City of Madison
738 F.2d 786 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 296, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,517 James I. Grann, Johnny E. Winston, Gerald R. Whitfield, John F. Stippl, Francis L. Retelle, Steven R. Reinstra, Richard J. Miller, Robert M. Lombardo, Steven A. Koecke, Rudolph J. Jergovic, Bernard D. Hebard, William S. Gilfroy, Dennis A. Gerfen, Lemuel B. Graser, Robert J. Faust, and Kenneth D. Couture, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. City of Madison, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
738 F.2d 786 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Jerome Bowden v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
733 F.2d 740 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Continental Cablevision v. Storer Broadcasting
583 F. Supp. 427 (E.D. Missouri, 1984)
33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1700, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,149 Lorraine Le Beau, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, and Local 19, United Glass and Ceramic Workers
727 F.2d 141 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Le Beau v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.
727 F.2d 141 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
William Henry Hance v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
696 F.2d 940 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
In re Plasmarc Systems, Inc.
18 B.R. 306 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1982)
Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. Sellers
621 P.2d 751 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1980)
Bertha J. HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THIOKOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
619 F.2d 489 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
22 Fair empl.prac.cas. 121, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,678 Meekie D. Moseley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Defendant-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. The Energy Research and Development Administration, Third Party-Defendant-Appellee
612 F.2d 187 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Moseley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
612 F.2d 187 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
In Re One Minor Child
411 A.2d 951 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 U.S. 990, 93 S. Ct. 333, 34 L. Ed. 2d 257, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bisno-v-martin-scotus-1972.