Bismark v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bismark v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

592 So. 2d 380, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 626, 1992 WL 16025

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 1992

DocketNo. 91-01785

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 380 (Bismark v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bismark v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 592 So. 2d 380, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 626, 1992 WL 16025 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

We affirm the order of adjudication and disposition of dependency in all respects, [381]*381except that we remand for the correction of a clerical error. Upon remand, the notation under section I.B. of the order which indicates that the children were found to be abused should be stricken. At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the trial court stated that there had been no evidence of abuse.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction of the clerical error.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CASE, JAMES R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THREADGILL, Judge.

We affirm the order of adjudication and disposition of dependency in all respects, [381]*381except that we remand for the correction of a clerical error. Upon remand, the notation under section I.B. of the order which indicates that the children were found to be abused should be stricken. At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, the trial court stated that there had been no evidence of abuse.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction of the clerical error.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CASE, JAMES R., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 380, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 626, 1992 WL 16025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bismark-v-state-department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-fladistctapp-1992.