Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bismark v. Crosby

Bismark v. Crosby

889 So. 2d 1017, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 2005 WL 17724
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-2217
StatusPublished

This text of 889 So. 2d 1017 (Bismark v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bismark v. Crosby, 889 So. 2d 1017, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 2005 WL 17724 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court’s order transferring Bismark’s petition for writ of mandamus is reversed and this matter is remanded with directions to proceed to a disposition on the merits of that petition. See Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davidson v. Crosby
883 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 1017, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 2005 WL 17724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bismark-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2005.