Bishop v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bishop v. State

577 S.W.2d 377, 1979 Tex. App. LEXIS 3196

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 7, 1979

Docket6843

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 577 S.W.2d 377 (Bishop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bishop v. State, 577 S.W.2d 377, 1979 Tex. App. LEXIS 3196 (Tex. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

This is a personal injury case brought against a State university and the State of Texas. The trial Court granted the Appel-lees’ motion to dismiss on the basis that the cause was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellees move for dismissal in this Court which we grant for want of jurisdiction of the trial Court.

The Appellant was a student at Pan American University when he was allegedly injured at a school function. There is no dispute that the incident occurred in Hidalgo County on October 31, 1974. This case was filed in Presidio County on July 12, 1977. The Appellee filed a plea to the jurisdiction and a motion to dismiss the case, asserting among other defenses the statute of limitations and that the Court was without jurisdiction because of Section 5 of the Texas Tort Claims Act. (Article 6252-19, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann.) The trial Court granted the motion to dismiss, finding the cause barred by Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. Art. 5526, the two-year statute of limitations.

The State of Texas has governmental immunity except as waived under the Texas Tort Claims Act. Section 5 of the Act provides:

All cases arising under the provisions of this Act shall be instituted in the county in which the cause of action or a part thereof arises.

It has been previously held that this provision is jurisdictional. Hardt v. Texas Department of Corrections, 530 S.W.2d 897 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1975, no writ). In Hardt, the contention that Section 5 related to venue only and was not jurisdictional was rejected. Id. at 898. Since a State may withhold entirely its consent to be sued, when it does waive liability it can impose conditions that it only be sued in certain courts and places. State v. Isbell, 127 Tex. 399, 94 S.W.2d 423 (1936). Under Section 5, the Appellee could only be sued in Hidalgo County, where the cause of action arose. Because this case was filed in Presidio County, the dismissal by the trial Court was correct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

This is a personal injury case brought against a State university and the State of Texas. The trial Court granted the Appel-lees’ motion to dismiss on the basis that the cause was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellees move for dismissal in this Court which we grant for want of jurisdiction of the trial Court.

The Appellant was a student at Pan American University when he was allegedly injured at a school function. There is no dispute that the incident occurred in Hidalgo County on October 31, 1974. This case was filed in Presidio County on July 12, 1977. The Appellee filed a plea to the jurisdiction and a motion to dismiss the case, asserting among other defenses the statute of limitations and that the Court was without jurisdiction because of Section 5 of the Texas Tort Claims Act. (Article 6252-19, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann.) The trial Court granted the motion to dismiss, finding the cause barred by Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. Art. 5526, the two-year statute of limitations.

The State of Texas has governmental immunity except as waived under the Texas Tort Claims Act. Section 5 of the Act provides:

All cases arising under the provisions of this Act shall be instituted in the county in which the cause of action or a part thereof arises.

It has been previously held that this provision is jurisdictional. Hardt v. Texas Department of Corrections, 530 S.W.2d 897 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1975, no writ). In Hardt, the contention that Section 5 related to venue only and was not jurisdictional was rejected. Id. at 898. Since a State may withhold entirely its consent to be sued, when it does waive liability it can impose conditions that it only be sued in certain courts and places. State v. Isbell, 127 Tex. 399, 94 S.W.2d 423 (1936). Under Section 5, the Appellee could only be sued in Hidalgo County, where the cause of action arose. Because this case was filed in Presidio County, the dismissal by the trial Court was correct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 S.W.2d 377, 1979 Tex. App. LEXIS 3196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-state-texapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack