Bishop v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bishop v. State

174 S.W.3d 710, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 2005 WL 2847663

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2005·No. WD 64432·Published

Opinion

*711 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Bishop appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule citations are to Missouri Rules of Procedure (2005) unless otherwise noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*711 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Bishop appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule citations are to Missouri Rules of Procedure (2005) unless otherwise noted.

Bishop v. State, 174 S.W.3d 710, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 2005 WL 2847663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

174 S.W.3d 710 (Bishop v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.