Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State

114 So. 3d 1123, 2013 WL 3013539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-1377
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 1123 (Bishop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. State, 114 So. 3d 1123, 2013 WL 3013539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for the lower court to vacate appellant’s conviction for theft, and we affirm his conviction for dealing in stolen property. Blackmon v. State, 58 So.3d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), review granted, 67 So.3d 198 (Fla.2011). We affirm his remaining convictions without comment.

REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, and REMANDED.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackmon v. State
58 So. 3d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 1123, 2013 WL 3013539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.