Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State

114 So. 3d 1123, 2013 WL 3013539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bishop v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 2013·No. No. 1D12-1377·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for the lower court to vacate appellant’s conviction for theft, and we affirm his conviction for dealing in stolen property. Blackmon v. State, 58 So.3d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), review granted, 67 So.3d 198 (Fla.2011). We affirm his remaining convictions without comment.

REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, and REMANDED.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bishop v. State, 114 So. 3d 1123, 2013 WL 3013539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

114 So. 3d 1123 (Bishop v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackmon v. State
58 So. 3d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)