Bishop v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bishop v. State

613 So. 2d 144, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1825, 1993 WL 33799

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1993·No. No. 92-00596·Published

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

Ronnie Bishop appeals his judgment and sentences for possession of a firearm by a felon, armed burglary, two counts of attempted armed robbery, and attempted second-degree murder. We affirm his convictions and sentences, but remand the judgment for correction of a clerical error.

The jury found Mr. Bishop guilty of attempted second-degree murder. The judgment incorrectly reflects that he was found guilty of attempted murder in the first degree. The state concedes the error. Upon remand, the trial court should conform the judgment to the jury’s verdict. Mr. Bishop does not need to be present.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THREADGILL, Judge.

Ronnie Bishop appeals his judgment and sentences for possession of a firearm by a felon, armed burglary, two counts of attempted armed robbery, and attempted second-degree murder. We affirm his convictions and sentences, but remand the judgment for correction of a clerical error.

The jury found Mr. Bishop guilty of attempted second-degree murder. The judgment incorrectly reflects that he was found guilty of attempted murder in the first degree. The state concedes the error. Upon remand, the trial court should conform the judgment to the jury’s verdict. Mr. Bishop does not need to be present.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Bishop v. State, 613 So. 2d 144, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1825, 1993 WL 33799 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

613 So. 2d 144 (Bishop v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.