Bishop v. State
This text of 613 So. 2d 144 (Bishop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronnie Bishop appeals his judgment and sentences for possession of a firearm by a felon, armed burglary, two counts of attempted armed robbery, and attempted second-degree murder. We affirm his convictions and sentences, but remand the judgment for correction of a clerical error.
The jury found Mr. Bishop guilty of attempted second-degree murder. The judgment incorrectly reflects that he was found guilty of attempted murder in the first degree. The state concedes the error. Upon remand, the trial court should conform the judgment to the jury’s verdict. Mr. Bishop does not need to be present.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 So. 2d 144, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1825, 1993 WL 33799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.