Bishop v. Shein Distribution Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 1, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-01277·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: 12/1/2023 SHEALEEN LOUISE BISHOP, Plaintiff, 1:23-cev-1277-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL SHEIN DISTRIBUTION CORP., Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 79]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by January 2, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

Date: December 1, 2023 MARY Y VYSKOCI New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bishop v. Shein Distribution Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Bishop v. Shein Distribution Corp. (Bishop v. Shein Distribution Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)