Bishop v. Ransom

39 Mo. 417
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Fagg, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding to set aside a sale made in pursuance of an execution issued from the office of the clerk of the Kansas City Court of Common Pleas. The motion was overruled by the court, exceptions duly taken, and the case brought here by writ of error. There was no motion for a new trial, and this court will not undertake to review the error complained of. It was matter, of exception purely, and, according to the uniform opinion of this court, the necessity for making such a motion cannot be dispensed with.

The other judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bishop v. Ransom, 39 Mo. 417 (Mo. 1867).

39 Mo. 417 (Bishop v. Ransom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson ex rel. Hemminghaus v. Greve
60 Mo. App. 170 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
City of St. Louis v. Brooks
107 Mo. 380 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Crow, Hargadine & Co. v. Stevens
44 Mo. App. 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)