Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd.

58 F. App'x 997
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2003
DocketNo. 02-2099
StatusPublished

This text of 58 F. App'x 997 (Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd., 58 F. App'x 997 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jerry L. Bishop appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his age discrimination and retaliation suit and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd., 212 F.Supp.2d 518 (W.D.N.C.2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd.
212 F. Supp. 2d 518 (W.D. North Carolina, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 F. App'x 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-peppertree-resorts-ltd-ca4-2003.