Bishop v. Nelson

83 Ill. 601
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 83 Ill. 601 (Bishop v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Nelson, 83 Ill. 601 (Ill. 1876).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment in this case is reversed, on the

authority of Hoagland v. Creed, 81 Ill. 506, wherein it was held that parties could not stipulate to confer judicial functions upon an individual, and clothe him with judicial power. This was not an arbitration, Mr. Wood being the arbitrator mutually chosen, but it was an attempt to confer upon him the power of a judge, to decide the pending case, and he did decide it, the court carrying out his decision by entering the judgment he had reached, and not his own judgment. There is no authority for this proceeding, and the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
575 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
575 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 2015)
In re Caffrey
52 A.D. 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
People ex rel. v. Altgeld
43 Ill. App. 460 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1891)
Haverly Invincible Mining Co. v. Howcutt
4 Colo. L. Rep. 62 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1883)
Russell v. Sargent
7 Ill. App. 98 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 Ill. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-nelson-ill-1876.