Bishop v. McNeil

1 So. 3d 1101, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 2009 WL 36534
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 2009
Docket1D08-1455
StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 1101 (Bishop v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. McNeil, 1 So. 3d 1101, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 2009 WL 36534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari, insofar as it challenges the calculation of his release date by the Department of Corrections, is denied on the merits. The claims presented by petitioner for the first time in the petition are denied on authority of Riddell v. Department of Corrections, 538 So.2d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Messiah
538 So. 2d 175 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 1101, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 2009 WL 36534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2009.