Bishop v. Maurer

875 N.E.2d 883, 9 N.Y.3d 910, 844 N.Y.S.2d 165
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 18, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 875 N.E.2d 883 (Bishop v. Maurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Maurer, 875 N.E.2d 883, 9 N.Y.3d 910, 844 N.Y.S.2d 165 (N.Y. 2007).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with *911 costs, and the certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. It is true that plaintiffs here, as is normally the case, are bound by the estate planning documents decedent signed. Nevertheless, the conclusiveness of the underlying agreement does not absolutely preclude an action for professional malpractice against an attorney for negligently giving to a client an incorrect explanation of the contents of a legal document (see Arnav Indus., Inc. Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 305 [2001]). Here, however, plaintiffs’ complaint is devoid of any nonconclusory allegation that incorrect advice was given.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gans v. Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC
2026 NY Slip Op 01305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Alrose Steinway, LLC v. Jaspan Schlesinger, LLP
2022 NY Slip Op 03310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Berkovits v. Berkovits
2021 NY Slip Op 00406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Freeman v. Brecher
2017 NY Slip Op 7949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz v. CVR Energy, Inc.
2016 NY Slip Op 7091 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Arnold v. Devane
123 A.D.3d 1202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Herschman v. Kern, Augustine, Conroy & Schoppman
113 A.D.3d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Joseph Delgreco & Co. v. DLA Piper L.L.P. (U.S.)
899 F. Supp. 2d 268 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Phoenix Erectors, LLC v. Fogarty
90 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
O'Callaghan v. Brunelle
84 A.D.3d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Bishop v. Maurer
83 A.D.3d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Kram Knarf, LLC v. Djonovic
74 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Scartozzi v. Potruch
72 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Fielding v. Kupferman
65 A.D.3d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Matz v. Prospect Energy Corp.
63 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Abreu v. Quesada
56 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Arfa v. Zamir
55 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Faden v. Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, LLP
52 A.D.3d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Maurice W. Pomfrey & Associates., Ltd. v. Hancock & Estabrook, LLP
50 A.D.3d 1531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 N.E.2d 883, 9 N.Y.3d 910, 844 N.Y.S.2d 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-maurer-ny-2007.