Bishop v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Bishop v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2002)

DecidedJanuary 22, 2002

Docket(Accelerated Calendar) Case No. CA2001-09-028.

StatusUnpublished

This text of Bishop v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2002) (Bishop v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bishop v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2002), (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY This cause is an accelerated appeal from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas in which the trial court granted the Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment of defendant-appellee, Eastern Savings Bank.

Appellants' assignment of error is overruled since the trial court's decision to grant the 60(B) motion was not an abuse of discretion. RoseChevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17, 20; Brewer v. ButlerCty. Bldg. Zoning Dept. (2001), 142 Ohio App.3d 567, 576-77. The record supports a finding that the motion was granted within a reasonable time, that appellee is entitled to relief under the grounds set forth in Civ.R. 60(B)(1)-(5), and that appellee has a valid defense to present if relief is granted. See GTE Automatic Elec., Inc. v. ARC Industries,Inc. (1976), 47 Ohio St.2d 146, 150-51.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and will not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.

Anthony Valen, Judge, and Stephen W. Powell, Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY This cause is an accelerated appeal from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas in which the trial court granted the Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment of defendant-appellee, Eastern Savings Bank.

Appellants' assignment of error is overruled since the trial court's decision to grant the 60(B) motion was not an abuse of discretion. RoseChevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17, 20; Brewer v. ButlerCty. Bldg. Zoning Dept. (2001), 142 Ohio App.3d 567, 576-77. The record supports a finding that the motion was granted within a reasonable time, that appellee is entitled to relief under the grounds set forth in Civ.R. 60(B)(1)-(5), and that appellee has a valid defense to present if relief is granted. See GTE Automatic Elec., Inc. v. ARC Industries,Inc. (1976), 47 Ohio St.2d 146, 150-51.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Pursuant to App.R. 11.1(E), this entry shall not be relied upon as authority and will not be published in any form. A certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.

Anthony Valen, Judge, and Stephen W. Powell, Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bishop v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (1-22-2002), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-kirby-unpublished-decision-1-22-2002-ohioctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack