Bishop v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Bishop v. Harris

1934 OK 626, 33 P.2d 490, 168 Okla. 626, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 60

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 26, 1934

Docket25326

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1934 OK 626 (Bishop v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bishop v. Harris, 1934 OK 626, 33 P.2d 490, 168 Okla. 626, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 60 (Okla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Lincoln county, Okla., rendered on June 13, 1933. The motion for new trial was overruled on the 22nd day of July, 1933. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on the 25th day of January, 1934. The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that this proceeding was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or order overruling the motion for new trial. Section 547, O. S. 1931, provides that all proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying a judgment or final order shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.

In the ease of Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Austin, 161 Okla. 280, 18 P. (2d) 539, the syllabus is as follows:

“Where petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the judgment or order appealed from, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”

To like effect see Gilmore v. Smith, 93 Okla. 4, 219 P. 92; Verschoyle v. McDaniels, 127 Okla. 166, 260 P. 55; Williams et al. v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, 165 Okla. 244, 25 P. (2d) 1086.

The time in which to file the appeal in this action expired on the 22nd day of January, 1934. Since petition in error with case-made attached was not filed in this court until the 25th day of January, 1934, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause, and the appeal is dismissed. 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Lincoln county, Okla., rendered on June 13, 1933. The motion for new trial was overruled on the 22nd day of July, 1933. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on the 25th day of January, 1934. The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that this proceeding was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or order overruling the motion for new trial. Section 547, O. S. 1931, provides that all proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying a judgment or final order shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.

In the ease of Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Austin, 161 Okla. 280, 18 P. (2d) 539, the syllabus is as follows:

“Where petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the judgment or order appealed from, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”

To like effect see Gilmore v. Smith, 93 Okla. 4, 219 P. 92; Verschoyle v. McDaniels, 127 Okla. 166, 260 P. 55; Williams et al. v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, 165 Okla. 244, 25 P. (2d) 1086.

The time in which to file the appeal in this action expired on the 22nd day of January, 1934. Since petition in error with case-made attached was not filed in this court until the 25th day of January, 1934, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause, and the appeal is dismissed. 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK 626, 33 P.2d 490, 168 Okla. 626, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-harris-okla-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack