Bishop v. Glassen

12 P. 258, 5 Cal. Unrep. 744
California Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 1886·No. No. 9621·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the COURT.

We have examined the transcript herein, and are of opinion that this case must be governed by the rulings of this court in Davis v. Scott, 56 Cal. 165, Hosmer v. Duggan, 56 Cal. 258, and McBrown v. Morris, 59 Cal. 64. This must result in an affirmance of the judgment. Conceding that the showing is sufficient to authorize the court to grant the motion here made, and vacate the judgment of affirmance heretofore rendered, it would be useless to do so where, upon the hearing, the like judgment must follow. The motion is therefore denied: Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 584. Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bishop v. Glassen, 12 P. 258, 5 Cal. Unrep. 744 (Cal. 1886).

12 P. 258 (Bishop v. Glassen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caldwell v. Bush
45 P. 488 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1896)