Bishop v. Force
820 P.2d 463, 109 Or. App. 688, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1695
This text of 820 P.2d 463 (Bishop v. Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bishop v. Force, 820 P.2d 463, 109 Or. App. 688, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1695 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
In her second amended complaint, plaintiff sued defendant for malpractice and fraud. The trial court dismissed both claims on defendant’s ORCP 21A(8) motion. Defendant concedes that the motion was not directed at the fraud claim and that dismissing that claim was error.
Reversed and remanded on fraud claim; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
820 P.2d 463, 109 Or. App. 688, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-force-orctapp-1991.