Bishop v. County of Erie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bishop v. County of Erie

206 A.D.2d 871, 616 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 871 (Bishop v. County of Erie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bishop v. County of Erie, 206 A.D.2d 871, 616 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the summary judgment motion of defendant Burns International Security Systems, Inc. (Burns). Although the Security Services Agreement between Burns and the Buffalo Bills provided that it was not to confer any rights on any other party as a third-party beneficiary, "even inaction may give rise to tort liability where no duty to act would otherwise exist if, for example, performance of contractual obligations has induced detrimental reliance on continued performance and inaction would result not 'merely in withholding a benefit, but positively or actively in working an injury’ ” (Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220, 226, quoting Moch Co. v Rensselaer Water Co., 247 NY 160, 167). Burns failed to establish its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law based upon the alleged absence of a duty owing from it to plaintiff. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the summary judgment motion of defendant Burns International Security Systems, Inc. (Burns). Although the Security Services Agreement between Burns and the Buffalo Bills provided that it was not to confer any rights on any other party as a third-party beneficiary, "even inaction may give rise to tort liability where no duty to act would otherwise exist if, for example, performance of contractual obligations has induced detrimental reliance on continued performance and inaction would result not 'merely in withholding a benefit, but positively or actively in working an injury’ ” (Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220, 226, quoting Moch Co. v Rensselaer Water Co., 247 NY 160, 167). Burns failed to establish its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law based upon the alleged absence of a duty owing from it to plaintiff. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 871, 616 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-county-of-erie-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack