Bishop v. City of Henderson
This text of 36 F. App'x 636 (Bishop v. City of Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kevin Bishop appeals pro se the district court’s award of costs to prevailing defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm because Bishop fails to show that the district court abused its discretion in awarding costs. See U.S. ex rel. Lindenthal v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 61 F.3d 1402, 1414 (9th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-city-of-henderson-ca9-2002.