Bishop v. City of Henderson
36 F. App'x 636
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2002·No. No. 01-15536; D.C. No. CV-97-00877-PMP·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kevin Bishop appeals pro se the district court’s award of costs to prevailing defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm because Bishop fails to show that the district court abused its discretion in awarding costs. See U.S. ex rel. Lindenthal v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 61 F.3d 1402, 1414 (9th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bishop v. City of Henderson, 36 F. App'x 636 (9th Cir. 2002).
36 F. App'x 636 (Bishop v. City of Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bishop v. City of Henderson, Nevada
538 U.S. 989 (Supreme Court, 2003)