Bishop v. Bishop

233 P. 918, 133 Wash. 522, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1186
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 1925
DocketNo. 19042. Department One.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 233 P. 918 (Bishop v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Bishop, 233 P. 918, 133 Wash. 522, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1186 (Wash. 1925).

Opinion

Parker, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking a decree of divorce against the defendant upon the alleged ground of her abandonment and cruel treatment of him. A trial upon the merits resulted in the rendering of a decree of divorce as prayed for, from which the defendant has appealed to this court.

A painstaking review of the evidence in this case *523 renders it quite plain to us that the nearest substantial support the plaintiff has to his charges of abandonment and cruelty is the defendant’s refusal to accord to him sexual marital privileges. That is not one of the causes for divorce specified in our divorce statute; § 982, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. § 7501]. If that of itself constitutes abandonment or cruelty when persisted in without reasonable cause, such as because of ill health, as to which there is some conflict of authority (19 C. J. 58; 9 R. C. L. 368), then the answer to such charge in this case is found in the evidence introduced, which, to our minds, all but conclusively shows that such course of action on the part of the defendant was fully justified by the impaired condition of her health. We are slow to differ with a trial judge upon a question of fact, but feel constrained to do so in the light of the evidence in this case.

We do not feel called upon to further discuss the case. The decree is reversed.

Tolmax, C. J., Main, Bridges, and Askren, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harding v. Harding
118 P.2d 789 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Norris v. Norris
3 Conn. Supp. 223 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 P. 918, 133 Wash. 522, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-bishop-wash-1925.