Bishop v. Bishop

259 A.D. 917, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7289
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 917 (Bishop v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Bishop, 259 A.D. 917, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order granting motion of the defendant Cecelia A. Bishop to the extent of dismissing the complaint, in so far as it alleges a cause of action for partition in favor of specified plaintiffs and as to other plaintiffs in then capacity as children of a deceased first cousin of the intestate, John Thomas Smith, striking out specified parties defendant, severing the action and directing that it be continued in the names of certain specified plaintiffs claiming as sole distributees of their uncle, and directing service of a second amended complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, said amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Order granting motion of the defendants John T. Bishop, James G. Bishop and Marie C. Dorsey to the extent therein directed by dismissing that part of the cause of action in the complaint [918]*918alleging that the plaintiffs and certain named defendants are some of the heirs at law and next of Mn of John Thomas Smith, deceased, striking out certain named defendants as parties defendant, severing the action and continuing the same as to certain named plaintiffs as heirs at law of George Christopher Donohue, and directing service of a second amended complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, said amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [174 Misc. 2.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Deflacieuz
87 Misc. 2d 845 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1976)
In re the Estate of Meyer
204 Misc. 265 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 917, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-bishop-nyappdiv-1940.