Bishop v. Bishop

121 S.E. 305, 157 Ga. 408, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 61
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 24, 1924
DocketNo. 3986
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 121 S.E. 305 (Bishop v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Bishop, 121 S.E. 305, 157 Ga. 408, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 61 (Ga. 1924).

Opinions

Hines, J.

John Bishop filed his libel for divorce against his wife, Alice Welch Bishop, on the ground of willful and continued desertion for more than three years. On the trial of the case he testified to their marriage, the willful and continued desertion of himself by his wife for a period greatly exceeding three years, and that he was a resident and citizen of this State for more than twelve months before the filing of this suit. On his cross-examination, counsel representing the wife asked him if he had not, on May 19, 1908, been married, to one Della Wadsworth at Tumberlm, Lake [Lonoke?] County, Arkansas. The court instructed the witness, if he saw fit, he could decline to answer the question, if it tended to incriminate him; the court further saying to the wit[409]*409ness that he was under oath, sworn to tell the truth, and that the court wanted his answers to be truthful. Counsel for the wife again repeated the question substantially to the witness, but stated in addition the name of the justice of the peace who performed the marriage ceremony, the name of the county clerk who issued the license, and the date thereof. The husband stood mute. This colloquy then took place: By the court: “What do you say, Mr. Bishop? Either answer the question or state your reason for not answering it. Do one' or the other, Mr. Bishop, and let’s get along.” Witness: “What do you want me to answer?” The court: “Bead him the question.” This was done. The court: “Answer the question or else state your reason for not answering it.” Witness: “I told you,” and here the witness stopped. The court: “I will dismiss your case, if you don’t do one or the other.” After waiting a few minutes, the court said: “Well, take an order dismissing his case. Let me see the paper you have in your hand, Mr. Steed,” the latter being the attorney for the wife. The paper referred to was a marriage license issued by the county clerk of Lonoke County, Arkansas, dated May 18, 1908, and authorizing the marriage of John Bishop to Della Wadsworth, with the certificate of a justice of the peace that on May 19, 1908, he had solemnized the marriage of these parties. This document was not offered in evidence by either of the parties, but was introduced in evidence by direction of the court. Thereupon the court passed an order dismissing the suit; to which judgment the plaintiff excepted on the ground that it was contrary to law, in that the case, under the evidence, should have been submitted to the jury.

The headnotes need not be elaborated.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricky Whitman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Whitman v. State
729 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Hubbard v. State
325 S.E.2d 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Cohran v. Carlin
299 S.E.2d 54 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
City of St. Petersburg v. Houghton
362 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Vail v. Vail
360 So. 2d 985 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Penn Communications Specialties, Inc. v. Hess
65 F.R.D. 510 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Busby v. Citizens Bank of Hapeville
206 S.E.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Mahne v. Mahne
304 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Temple v. Temple
184 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. Wilmont
123 Ga. App. 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Interstate Life &C. Ins. Co. v. Wilmont
180 S.E.2d 913 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Townsend v. Northcutt
173 S.E.2d 470 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Smith v. State
168 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Christenson v. Christenson
162 N.W.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1968)
Bass v. Bass
149 S.E.2d 818 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Pilcher v. State
92 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 305, 157 Ga. 408, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-bishop-ga-1924.