Bishop v. Allen

1924 OK 764, 229 P. 1116, 102 Okla. 285, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 196
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 23, 1924
Docket15209
StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK 764 (Bishop v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bishop v. Allen, 1924 OK 764, 229 P. 1116, 102 Okla. 285, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 196 (Okla. 1924).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case, defendant in error moves the court to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the case-made was not served within the valid extension of time. The order from which the appeal was taken was made on the 25th day of September, 1923, and the time was not extended in which to serve case-made. Case-made was not served within the statutory period of 15 days, but on the 9th day of November, 1923, the trial court extended the time 60. days. This order is void for want of jurisdiction on the part of the trial court to make this extension, and this court has no jurisdiction to review the case. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1924 OK 764, 229 P. 1116, 102 Okla. 285, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-allen-okla-1924.