Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Newsom

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE, No. 1:20-cv-01318-KES-SKO

11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 12 v. (Doc. 71) 13 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,

14 Defendants. 15

16 17 18 On April 1, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 19 (Doc. 71.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: April 2, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

26 27 28