Bishay v. McFadden
This text of Bishay v. McFadden (Bishay v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) BAHIG F. BISHAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 24-cv-2086 (APM) TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, et al., ) in his individual capacity, ) U.S. District Court Judge, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Bahig F. Bishay filed this action against Defendant U.S. District Court Judge
Trevor N. McFadden and 14 judges of the D.C. Circuit. Compl., ECF No. 1. The crux of the
Complaint is that Judge McFadden wrongfully dismissed a case that Plaintiff filed against various
federal officials and others, Bishay v. Harris, 21-cv-1831 (TNM). See generally id. In the
dismissed action, Judge McFadden entered an order enjoining Plaintiff from further filings in
federal court absent satisfying various conditions, including seeking leave of court to file a new
action. See Bishay v. Harris (Bishay I), 668 F. Supp. 3d 9, 14 (D.D.C. 2023). The D.C. Circuit
upheld the injunction. See Bishay v. Harris, No. 23-5019, 2023 WL 6784306, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct.
6, 2023). In filing this action, Plaintiff has not satisfied any of the pre-conditions to suit set forth
in Judge McFadden’s injunction. Bishay I, 668 F. Supp. 3d at 14. For that reason, this case is
dismissed.
The case also must be dismissed for the independent reason that judicial officers are
immune from suit for their judicial acts. See Atherton v. D.C. Off. of Mayor, 567 F.3d 672, 682
(D.C. Cir. 2009). Plaintiff only has alleged conduct performed in Defendants’ judicial capacities. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the court dismisses Plaintiff’s complaint and this
action with prejudice. Plaintiff’s various other motions, ECF Nos. 4, 5, and 7, are denied as moot.
A separate final order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Dated: July 30, 2024 Amit P. Mehta United States District Court Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bishay v. McFadden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishay-v-mcfadden-dcd-2024.