Bischoff v. Sarkas

360 A.2d 115, 116 R.I. 960, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bischoff v. Sarkas. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 R.I. 993
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 19, 1976·No. M. P. No. 76-282·Published

Opinion

This matter came on to be heard on the petitioners’ prayer for an ex parte stay of the issuance of a liquor license pending a determination by this court as to whether the writ of certiorari will issue. The prayer for a stay is denied. A conference relative to the issuance of a stay was attended [961]*961by attorneys for all interested parties. The applicant was informed that should it see fit to take advantage of its license, it ran the risk that a stay might be issued when this matter is considered by the entire court at its August 5, 1976, conference.

Archibald B. Kenyon, Jr., Town Solicitor, Kenyon & Aukerman, for petitioners. Office of the Attorney General, Julius C. Michaelson, Atty. Gen., Forrest Avila, Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff v. Sarkas, 360 A.2d 115, 116 R.I. 960, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1554 (R.I. 1976).

360 A.2d 115 (Bischoff v. Sarkas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.