Bischoff v. Dixie Auto Parts & Equipment Corp.

346 So. 2d 146
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 1977·No. No. 77-58·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review by this interlocutory appeal of an order of the Circuit Court for Dade County denying a motion to dismiss a counterclaim and cross-claim filed by the appellee against him subsequent to the entry of a default against it in a foreclosure suit. We find error and reverse.

It was error for the trial court to allow appellee, Dixie Auto Parts and Equipment Corp. to file and prosecute a cross-claim against appellant, a co-defendant, after a default had been entered against it. The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provide that a party in default may not file pleadings in an action, other than those pleadings of such nature as seek relief from the default. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500; Somerville v. Skidmore, 175 So.2d 575 (Fla.3rd DCA 1965). The order appealed is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff v. Dixie Auto Parts & Equipment Corp., 346 So. 2d 146 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

346 So. 2d 146 (Bischoff v. Dixie Auto Parts & Equipment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hines v. Hines
494 So. 2d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Rudner v. Cabrera
455 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Balzer v. Indian Lake Maintenance, Inc.
346 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)