Bisbing v. Bisbing

180 A.3d 714, 232 N.J. 396
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 12, 2018·No. M–866/867 September Term 2017; 077533·Published

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel fees and costs is denied without prejudice to defendant-movant making the application to the trial court for counsel fees and costs for work performed before the Supreme Court, and the trial court is hereby authorized to make the determination and award. For purposes of that determination, the trial court is directed to deem defendant-movant as the prevailing party before the Supreme Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the miscellaneous motion to compel plaintiff to pay fees awarded by the Appellate Division (M-867) is denied without prejudice to defendant-movant making an appropriate application for enforcement to the trial court. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bisbing v. Bisbing, 180 A.3d 714, 232 N.J. 396 (N.J. 2018).

180 A.3d 714 (Bisbing v. Bisbing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.