Bisbing v. Bisbing
This text of 180 A.3d 714 (Bisbing v. Bisbing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel fees and costs is denied without prejudice to defendant-movant making the application to the trial court for counsel fees and costs for work performed before the Supreme Court, and the trial court is hereby authorized to make the determination and award. For purposes of that determination, the trial court is directed to deem defendant-movant as the prevailing party before the Supreme Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the miscellaneous motion to compel plaintiff to pay fees awarded by the Appellate Division (M-867) is denied without prejudice to defendant-movant making an appropriate application for enforcement to the trial court. Jurisdiction is not retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 A.3d 714, 232 N.J. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bisbing-v-bisbing-nj-2018.