Bisbee v. Hall
This text of 1 Wright 59 (Bisbee v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record certainly is of a judgment in the -Supreme Court. The execution on its face is upon a judgment in the Court of Common Pleas. The execution provided by our law goes from the Court of Common Pleas, in cases taken to the Supreme Court, by appeal or by writ of error, though the judgment is in the Supreme Court. This Court cannot correct the errors of the process of another court. The objection is fatal, and the evidence is excluded. Verdict for the defendant.
A new trial is moved for, and submitted.
BY THE COURT. This issue is out of chancery. In such cases the practice is for the court of law to report to the court of chancery the verdict, and for that court on written application to allow ■or refuse at discretion, a new hearing, and for chancery to send the «case into the court of law again, if a rehearing is granted. The motion here, therefore, is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wright 59, 1 Ohio Ch. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bisbee-v-hall-ohio-1832.