Bisbee v. Cameron Dev. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Bisbee v. Cameron Dev. Co.

150 So. 589, 112 Fla. 443

DecidedOctober 26, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 589 (Bisbee v. Cameron Dev. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bisbee v. Cameron Dev. Co., 150 So. 589, 112 Fla. 443 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a suit to quiet title to lands, the complainant asserted title by adverse possession under color of title and adduced evidence to show possession for the satutory period under the requirements of Section 4655 (2935), Compiled General Laws, 1927. As there is substantial legal evidence to sustain the finding of the chancellor, and as it does not clearly appear from the whole record that the finding is erroneous, the decree is affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In a suit to quiet title to lands, the complainant asserted title by adverse possession under color of title and adduced evidence to show possession for the satutory period under the requirements of Section 4655 (2935), Compiled General Laws, 1927. As there is substantial legal evidence to sustain the finding of the chancellor, and as it does not clearly appear from the whole record that the finding is erroneous, the decree is affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 So. 589, 112 Fla. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bisbee-v-cameron-dev-co-fla-1933.