Birtan Yentur v. Munevver D. Korkmaz

Opinion

Opinion issued September 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00153-CV ——————————— BIRTAN YENTUR, Appellant V. MUNEVVER D. KORKMAZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 20-DCV-278942

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Birtan Yentur, has neither established indigence for purposes of

court costs nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). After being notified

that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond to this Court’s notice and a clerk’s record has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.