Birns v. Sweeney

93 N.E.2d 562, 154 Ohio St. 137, 154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 137, 42 Ohio Op. 199, 1950 Ohio LEXIS 395
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 12, 1950·No. 32294·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

A proceeding in habeas corpus cannot be used as a substitute for the remedy of appeal (Ex parte Elicker, 117 Ohio St., 500, 159 N. E., 478), nor can it be employed as a remedy by a person who has been convicted of a criminal offense and subjected to a fine and imprisonment which he claims to be in excess of the maximum prescribed by law (Ex parte Van Hagan, 25 Ohio St., 426, 432).

The petitioner having pursued the wrong remedy, we do not consider the validity of the sentence.

The relief prayed for is denied.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Tart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birns v. Sweeney, 93 N.E.2d 562, 154 Ohio St. 137, 154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 137, 42 Ohio Op. 199, 1950 Ohio LEXIS 395 (Ohio 1950).

93 N.E.2d 562 (Birns v. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dean v. Maxwell
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 193 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1963)
Foran v. Maxwell
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 561 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
Carmelo v. Maxwell
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 569 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
Johnson v. Sacks
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 452 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
Vertz v. Sacks
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 459 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
Barker v. Sacks
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 413 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
Weaver v. Sacks
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 415 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
Spence v. Sacks
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
In Re Glatz
115 N.E.2d 696 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1953)