Birnkrant v. Amerex Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Birnkrant v. Amerex Holding Corp.

247 A.D. 758

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action for money had and received based on a rescission of a contract of purchase of certain stock induced by false and fraudulent representations. Order denying motion to strike out parts of certain paragraphs and all of other paragraphs of the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Davis, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for money had and received based on a rescission of a contract of purchase of certain stock induced by false and fraudulent representations. Order denying motion to strike out parts of certain paragraphs and all of other paragraphs of the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Davis, J., not sitting.

Birnkrant v. Amerex Holding Corp., 247 A.D. 758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 758 (Birnkrant v. Amerex Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.