Birnberg v. Schwab

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Birnberg v. Schwab

56 N.W. 341, 55 Minn. 495, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 243

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 18, 1893

DocketNo. 8470

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.W. 341 (Birnberg v. Schwab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Birnberg v. Schwab, 56 N.W. 341, 55 Minn. 495, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 243 (Mich. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Gileillan, C. J.

There is no question presented in the case, except, did the evidence make a proper case for the jury upon the questions of defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence?

We are satisfied that upon both these questions the case was a proper one for the jury, and that their verdict must stand. The evidence presents only simple questions of fact, involving no rule or principle in the law on the subject of negligence, and therefore a rehearsal of it would be profitless.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gileillan, C. J.

There is no question presented in the case, except, did the evidence make a proper case for the jury upon the questions of defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence?

We are satisfied that upon both these questions the case was a proper one for the jury, and that their verdict must stand. The evidence presents only simple questions of fact, involving no rule or principle in the law on the subject of negligence, and therefore a rehearsal of it would be profitless.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.W. 341, 55 Minn. 495, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birnberg-v-schwab-minn-1893.