Birnbaum v. Ford Motor Co.

182 A.D.2d 524
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis N. Pécora, J.), entered November 23, 1990, which denied petitioner’s application to vacate an arbitration award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this "Lemon Law” case (General Business Law § 198-a) we decline to review petitioner’s sole argument on appeal that the arbitrator denied petitioner’s decedent due process, since the argument is raised for the first time on appeal and might have been factually countered by respondent had it been raised before the IAS court (see, City of New York v Stack, 178 AD2d 355). In any event, were we to review the argument on the merits, we would find that petitioner’s decedent was given notice and an opportunity to be heard (Matter of Kingsley v Redevco Corp., 61 NY2d 714, 715). Concur — Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birnbaum v. Ford Motor Co., 182 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

182 A.D.2d 524 (Birnbaum v. Ford Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAC Air Co. v. New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases
123 A.D.3d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)