Birnbaum v. Flaum

103 A.D.2d 1016
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 13, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 A.D.2d 1016 (Birnbaum v. Flaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Birnbaum v. Flaum, 103 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to respondents, in accordance with the following memorandum: We modify the order to include a provision declaring the agreement dated October 7, 1983 valid essentially for the reasons stated at Surrogate’s Court, Monroe County (Ciaccio, S.). We emphasize that the agreement as construed by the Surrogate does not result in a delegation or a diminution of any of Central’s fiduciary responsibilities and that the agreement in no way dilutes the sole power of the Surrogate to approve commissions. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Surrogate’s Court, Ciaccio, S. —- removal of coadministrator.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Birnbaum v. Flaum
112 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.2d 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birnbaum-v-flaum-nyappdiv-1984.