Birnbaum v. Feinstein

129 So. 2d 164, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3072
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1961
DocketNo. 60-673
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 So. 2d 164 (Birnbaum v. Feinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Birnbaum v. Feinstein, 129 So. 2d 164, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion to quash objections to a claim filed during the course of the probate of an estate.

An examination of the order sought to be reviewed reveals that it is an interlocutory and not a final order. This court is authorized to review only final orders or decrees of county judges’ courts pertaining to probate matters or to estates and interests of minors and incompetents. See Article V, Section 5(3), Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. See also In re Nolan’s Estate, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 341.

Accordingly, this appeal should be and it is hereby dismissed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Epperson v. Rupp
157 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 2d 164, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birnbaum-v-feinstein-fladistctapp-1961.