Birnbaum v. Birnbaum

155 A.D.2d 326, 547 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14087
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Birnbaum v. Birnbaum. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 A.D.2d 177

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered March 30, 1989, granting plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a supplemental complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion for leave to serve a supplemental complaint. Defendant fails to demonstrate that plaintiff’s delay in asserting the additional cause of action substantially impaired his ability to respond to it. (See, 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac If 3025.14, at 30-607.) Nor are we persuaded that plaintiffs counsel intentionally deceived opposing counsel; in any event, the conduct would not warrant denial of the motion. Further, we conclude that for purposes of the motion, the complaint sufficiently pleads, and plaintiffs affidavit adequately supports, a cause of action for divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment. Concur — Milonas, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 155 A.D.2d 326, 547 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

155 A.D.2d 326 (Birnbaum v. Birnbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.