Birmingham v. Evans
This text of 300 So. 2d 401 (Birmingham v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In. view of the holdings in Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104, 92 S.Ct. 1953, 32 L.Ed2d 584 (1972), Walker v. Dillard, D. C., 363 F.Supp. 921 (1973), and Manns v. Virginia, 213 Va. 322, 191 S.E.2d 810 (1972), all decided since Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491, rehearing denied 392 U.S. 947, 88 S.Ct. 2270, 20 L.Ed.2d 1412, (1968), we reaffirm the position taken by this court, holding that a jury trial should not be required in a municipal court or other court from which an appeal can be taken as a-matter of right to the circuit court or other court of similar jurisdiction, where the defendant can have a trial de novo before a jury.
Petition of Laura Birmingham for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Birmingham v. Evans, 53 Ala.App. 358, 300 So.2d 396, is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 So. 2d 401, 293 Ala. 136, 1974 Ala. LEXIS 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birmingham-v-evans-ala-1974.