Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Annen

Oregon Supreme Court

Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Annen

443 P.2d 227, 250 Or. 507, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 586

DecidedJuly 17, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 443 P.2d 227 (Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Annen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Annen, 443 P.2d 227, 250 Or. 507, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 586 (Or. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action brought by plaintiff insurance company as subrogee of the insured to recover the amount paid by plaintiff to the insured for a fire loss to a building which occurred while defendants were in possession of the premises under a lease from the insured. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit and plaintiff appeals.

We are of the opinion that the jury could not have reasonably concluded from the evidence that defendants. we.re negligent.

The judgment of the trial court is' affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action brought by plaintiff insurance company as subrogee of the insured to recover the amount paid by plaintiff to the insured for a fire loss to a building which occurred while defendants were in possession of the premises under a lease from the insured. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit and plaintiff appeals.

We are of the opinion that the jury could not have reasonably concluded from the evidence that defendants. we.re negligent.

The judgment of the trial court is' affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 P.2d 227, 250 Or. 507, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birmingham-fire-insurance-v-annen-or-1968.